From the category archives:

Psychology

JumpSo, we’re on to the final dichotomy within the Myers-Briggs type sorter: judging versus perceiving.  This is, essentially, how one chooses to act within their daily activities.

Judgers prefer to have matters settled.  They like order, plans and to-do lists.  They struggle with ambiguity and like to understand all the options before they embark on a project.  Above all, they value predictability.  I happen to be one of these types.

Perceivers, on the other hand, like ambiguity.  Many of the people that you would call “free spirits” are perceivers.  They go with the flow, and like to have many options.  They struggle with lists and would rather not be locked into a particular decision.  This preference can cause issues with J’s, who tend to get a little panicky when confronted with so much ambiguity in a process.

Throughout this series, I’ve been trying to offer ways that one can “style switch”, or attempt to walk a mile in someone else’s shoes, so to speak.  This one is no different.  Think of a particular project you’re going to begin, or have recently begun, and try some of the following steps.

If you’re a perceiver, try to work on a specific project from the point of view of a “J”.  Work in a systematic fashion, itemize the tasks that need to occur and work through them in an orderly manner.  Notice how much easier is to complete a project if you can think it all through from beginning to end at one time, and move methodically through a process.

Conversely, if you’re a “J”, try working as a “P” for one project.  You can still have a plan (we J’s get a little bit worried with a total lack of planning), but don’t be a slave to it.  Once you begin working through your project, take a moment to pause and see if any new methods of achieving your goals present themselves due to what has happened thus far.  P’s do this type of observation automatically, but we J’s need to make a conscious effort to do it.

If you’re a P, you need to make sure that you’re not spending more time than is necessary accomplishing tasks, simply due to your not having thought through the process fully.  If you find yourself working and needing to back up in the process due to forgetting to accomplish a contingent task, you may need to take a good look at your work style.

J’s need to watch out for ruts.  It’s helpful to ask a “P” friend to take a look at whatever you’re trying to accomplish and see if you’ve missed anything that could improve your results.  It’s difficult to see the forest for the trees sometimes when you’re a “J”, and you don’t want to miss any opportunities if you can avoid it.

Did you enjoy this post? Then Stumble it!

UnemotionalWhereas in the last group (intuition vs sensing), we discovered how people take in and interpret information from their surroundings, in this dichotomy we begin to understand how we make decisions based on that information.

Thinkers want their decision to be based solely on the facts, with no interference from emotions.  For instance, in a position of authority in a business organization, thinkers will have much less difficulty making reductions to staffing and resources if it can be shown that the decision makes economic or strategic sense.

Feelers, on the other hand, will struggle with a similar decision, often to the point of not making the necessary reductions and hurting the business’ bottom line, all because the feeler doesn’t want to hurt people’s feelings.

As with the other two continuums that we’ve already discussed, there are very few people who are totally at one end of the scale or the other.  It’s merely a matter of toward which end you lean.  Likewise, different situations or topics may cause you to lean more one way or the other than what you would normally.

As far as examples of how one would “style switch”, or attempt to work on an issue from their non-preferred end of the spectrum, I think that this dichotomy may be the hardest of the four in which to attempt to do that.  Because emotions are such powerful influences, people who have developed a tendency to ignore them have built up massive defenses to them.  Likewise, those who are used to listening to them may find it very hard to tune them out.

Your best bet is to simply be able to identify a person who has the opposite tendency that you have and ask them how they would make a decision on the situation you are facing.  You may not be able to truly internalize this decision, but at least you will know what the other side thinks of it.

Perhaps, if a “thinker” gives you a rational decision that strains against your normal “feeler” tendencies, you can look for aspects of the decision that can be implemented while still maintaining a decision you can live with.

Likewise, thinkers should look for ways to incorporate feeler tendencies, especially in situations where tough decisions are going to be made and feelings hurt.  The same end result can be accomplished, while also being sensitive to other’s feelings.  As Mary Poppins said, “A spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down”.

Did you enjoy this post? Then Stumble it!